Displays the overall probability of miscarriage - or, conversely, the probability of birth - based on pregnancy length by day and maternal history.

Move your mouse over the graph to get the specific odds for that day. |
Switch to Table Mode |

Nervous about miscarriage? Let us reassure you.

Knowing doesn't have to be scary. The Daily Miscarriage Probability Chart calculates the probability of miscarriage or, conversely, the probability of birth, given how far a woman is in her pregnancy. The underlying model can also account for added risk factors like maternal age, weight, the number of previous miscarriages and the number of previous live births.

The miscarriage probability graph displays the probability of a miscarriage occurring on or after a given point in pregnancy. You can therefore find the day-specific odds, or the odds between two points in time, by subtracting the probability associated with date from another. For example, if the model gives the probability of a miscarriage occurring on or after 4 weeks, 0 days is as 25.2%, and the probability of a miscarriage occurring on or after 4 weeks, 1 day as 24.4%, then the probability of a miscarriage occurring at exactly 4 weeks, 0 days is 25.2-24.4 or 0.8%. Probabilities in the graph are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent, so very small probability differences between two dates may not be noticeable in the graph.

**Take the Probabilities With You**

Want to bookmark the Miscarriage Probability Chart with all it's data so you don't have to keep re-entering your maternal info it day after day?

Click here to get a parameterized URL.

**About the model**

Miscarriage is generally recognized as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks gestation.
That is the definition we are using as well. This page calculates the cumulative
probability of pregnancy loss from a given point in pregnancy through 20 weeks gestation. Beyond 20 weeks gestation pregnancy
most often ends in a live birth, and rarely in stillbirth.
Thus, we refer to the probability of not miscarrying as the
probability of birth.
Why not include stillbirth data? There's a reason the medical community treats stillbirth differently than miscarriage.
They're two different types of loss with different sets of causes and risk factors. Most importantly (for modelling purposes)
the per-week risk of stillbirth actually increases later in pregnancy,
around the time of birth.
In order to model cumulative risk of all types of pregnancy loss, including stillbirth, effectively, we'd need to estimate
pregnancy length, which we can do but would introduce additional uncertainty and
decrease accuracy.

The underlying model for this site is derived using meta analysis of the following peer reviewed papers on miscarriage. The model can be be used without additional input, or can be adjusted with any combination of maternal age, height/weight (BMI), number of previous miscarriages and number of previous births inputs. Each variable is modeled separately, assumed to be independent and assumed to affect the probability of miscarriage uniformly over time. These assumptions are likely overly strong, as there are likely confounding variables, but is the most reasonable approximation in the absence of additional data.

- [1] Tong, S., Kaur, A., Walker, S. P., Bryant, V., Onwude, J. L., and Permezel, M. (2008), Miscarriage Risk for Asymptomatic Women After a Normal First-Trimester Prenatal Visit. Obstetrics & Gynecology: March 2008 - Volume 111 - Issue 3 - pp 710-714 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163747c
- [2] Wang, J. X., Davies, M. J. and Norman, R. J. (2002), Obesity Increases the Risk of Spontaneous Abortion during Infertility Treatment. Obesity Research, 10: 551–554. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.74
- [3] Maconochie, N., Doyle, P., Prior, S. and Simmons, R. (2007), Risk factors for first trimester miscarriage—results from a UK-population-based case–control study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 114: 170–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01193.x
- [4]
Avalos, L. A., Galindo, C., Li, D. (2012) A systematic review to calculate background miscarriage rates using life table analysis.
Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
Volume 94, Issue 6. pages 417–423. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23014

Including cited studies:- Taylor (1970)
- Harlap et al (1980)
- Goldhaber and Fireman (1991)
- Li et al (2002)

- [5] Mukherjee, S., Velez Edwards, D. R., Baird, D. D., Savitz, D. A., Hartmann, K. E.; (2013) Risk of Miscarriage Among Black Women and White Women in a US Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 2013; 177 (11): 1271-1278. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws393

Combined, the studies include results from over 50,000 participants. Results from multiple studies are weighted differently depending on the number of participants included in the study, demographics of the study participants and study methodology.

Interested in reading the studies? We've put together a summery of best practices when approaching research papers about miscarriage so that you can get the most out of them.

*This website is intended for informational & entertainment purposes only.
This website is not intended to be considered medical advice.*

**Pregnant?** You may enjoy our other pregnancy apps like the Miscarriage Reassurer or the Personalized Week by Week Calendar. When you are a little further along in your pregnancy, be sure to check out the Labor Probability Calculator and Labor Probability Chart.

**Into Probability Distributions?** You may also be interested in our Labor Probability Chart, which charts the probability of labor over time using a left skewed normal distribution.

**Wanting to become pregnant?** Our Time to Conception Calculator
can estimate how long it may take.